Counties · Wyoming
Wyoming counties
- 23Counties
- 9,388Federal records
9,388 federal facility and compliance records are on file across 23 Wyoming counties, listed largest first. Every county with records in more than one program is here, not a selection.
Natrona County carries the most records of any Wyoming county here, 1,055, and Hot Springs County the fewest on this list, with 81. Counties are listed largest first, and every one named links to its own profile of federal facility and compliance records and to the industries recorded in it.
- Natrona County 1,055
- Laramie County 969
- Campbell County 968
- Sheridan County 779
- Sweetwater County 692
- Fremont County 603
- Park County 458
- Converse County 375
- Uinta County 320
- Lincoln County 318
- Carbon County 308
- Teton County 296
- Sublette County 287
- Big Horn County 261
- Albany County 258
- Goshen County 252
- Johnson County 234
- Platte County 209
- Crook County 199
- Washakie County 198
- Weston County 162
- Niobrara County 106
- Hot Springs County 81
All Wyoming records → Wyoming cities →
What this page shows
The page lists the counties of Wyoming that carry federal facility and compliance records. There are 23 counties with records in total. The combined count for these records is 9387. Natrona County holds 1055 records. Laramie County holds 969 records. Campbell County holds 968 records. Sheridan County holds 779 records. These specific counts show the distribution of data across different jurisdictions. Federal records for the state matter for tracking compliance. They provide a factual basis for state-level oversight. The data reflects the volume of federal interactions. It allows for a clear view of administrative activity. The figures represent the scope of federal presence. They indicate where regulatory attention is directed. The records serve as a reference for state affairs. They document the extent of federal operations. The information is structured by county. This format supports detailed review. It highlights the variation in record counts. The data supports transparency in state governance. It offers a snapshot of federal engagement. The figures are specific to each location. They illustrate the breadth of federal oversight. The counts are distinct for each county. This breakdown aids in understanding local impacts. The records are part of a larger federal system. They contribute to the overall state profile. The data is presented without editorial commentary. It remains strictly factual in nature. The focus is on the numerical values. These values define the current state of records.
Figures from the federal source files: EPA’s ECHO downloads, CMS provider files and the FMCSA census.